Happy Veteran's Day to all of our brothers and sisters, yesterday and today. Thank you.

Heritage backs off their impeccable reporting on ObamaCare and Cap and Trade to highlight the wisdom of this Congress concerning wartime defense cuts. 

Some of the lowlights:

During the past few months, Congress and the President effectively shut down the purchase of next-generation equipment for the military. That includes: the Air Force’s F-22 fifth-generation fighter aircraft, the most sophisticated in the world; the Army’s ground vehicles designed to replace a combat fleet built in the 1970s and 80s; two types of helicopters-one which fulfills the unique duty of rescuing military personnel held behind enemy lines; and large cuts to the missile defense program designed to thwart the threat of long-range ballistic missiles from hitting U.S. shores and cities.

What’s likely next year? Jack Reed (D-RI), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, recently opined that the Department of Defense should buckle up for some (more) “painful adjustments”-as if any more could be borne by those in uniform-and get ready to do the following:

• sacrifice defense dollars to pay for TARP, the stimulus bill, domestic programs and the federal debt;
• hand over another chunk of the defense budget to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for civilian aid or “soft power” programs; and
• delay or cut weapons programs that are not “absolutely essential.”

 Does anyone else notice an incongruence in debating whether to send 30+thousand troops to Afghanistan while preparing to hamstring DOD and our soldiers with unnecessary and dangerous funding cuts?

Why don't we just send them out with potato guns and cardboard shields. That oughta do the trick.

Jackasses. 

Unfortunately, Congress set a horrible precedent, having given the President so many of his defense cuts during a time of war. That just makes more devastating cancellations likely in the coming years.

The problem is that, since they have no new weapons systems to slash, politicians will need to start eliminating equipment that today’s troops are using everyday. This includes replacements for tanks, trucks, ships and planes that are already worn out after nine years of consecutive warfare in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In short, finding further “savings” in the defense budget would require cutting to the bone and hurting those in uniform. Having a world-class military and truly honoring those who serve requires policymakers to provide the same technologically-advanced equipment to defeat any enemy when necessary and protect those in harm’s way.

Providing the military just enough to barely get by is dangerous, and an outright dereliction of duty by federal policymakers whose first job is found in the preamble of the U.S. Constitution: to provide for the common defense of the American people.

 Since January 20, 2009, this Administration and this Congress has been one giant dereliction of duty, in every respect. Forget about the blatant unconstitutionality of ObamaCare and Cap and Trade for the moment, Obama's worldview and ideology are crystal clear in the priorities to which he spends and cuts. Spend on garbage that produces nothing in return and cut programs to the soldiers whose very lives are at stake for our protection. 

"Dereliction" just doesn't quite seem to cut it...especially today.

Russ